mcp-tool

Listing Sprint

Your existing MCP server or API, made directory-ready.

$1,900 one-time

5 business days

Most MCP servers that fail review fail on the same short list: a tool without a title, a write tool without a destructiveHint, an OAuth flow that does not support the registration mode the directory expects, a privacy policy that is missing or does not say what happens to the data, a test account the reviewer cannot get into. None of it is hard. All of it is a rejection.

The Listing Sprint takes a server you already have and closes that list. You get a written audit against Anthropic's published criteria and OpenAI's, the fixes as code in a pull request, the documents the listing needs, and a person next to you when you submit.

What is included

  • Every tool gets a title and the right readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
  • OAuth 2.0 flow checked against what the Claude and ChatGPT reviews expect
  • Privacy policy and setup docs written for the listing
  • Test account and reviewer instructions prepared
  • Screenshots for MCP Apps, cropped to spec
  • Fix list with code for everything the review would reject
  • 30 minutes together in the submission portal

What we need from you

  • The server URL, or the repository if we should make the fixes ourselves
  • A test account on your product with data in it
  • Your privacy policy, if one exists, and the name of who signs off on legal text
  • The Owner of your Claude Team or Enterprise organisation, for thirty minutes on day five

Not included

  • Building new tools (that is the Build)
  • Hosting after handover (that is Care)

Timeline

What happens when.

Day 1Audit against both directories' criteria. You get the list the same day.
Days 2 to 3Fixes as code: annotations, OAuth, error handling, descriptions written for a model, not a developer.
Day 4Privacy policy, docs page, reviewer instructions, screenshots for MCP Apps. Test account walked through end to end.
Day 5Submission together, from your organisation. One round of reviewer feedback fixed afterwards, included.

Questions

Specific to this package.

Our server is a local stdio server. Does that qualify?

Anthropic lists remote servers in the Connectors Directory and local ones as desktop extensions. We handle either; a local server goes through the MCPB submission form instead of the portal, and the sprint covers the bundle manifest and its privacy fields.

What if the audit finds more than a sprint can fix?

Then you hear it on day one, with a written scope for the rest. Most of the time the answer is that the server needs the Build rather than a sprint, and the sprint fee is credited against it.

The general questions, who submits, who owns the code, where it is hosted, are answered on the home page.

Listing Sprint, $1,900 one-time.

Not this one? Build, $4,900 or Care, $390.